Appeal-to-Authority Fallacy

by Craig Shrives

What Is the Appeal-to-Authority Fallacy?

The Quick Answer

In Critical Thinking, the appeal-to-authority fallacy is unquestioningly adopting the same position as an expert.
The appeal-to-authority fallacy, also known as argument from authority, is a logical fallacy in which the validity or truthfulness of a claim is based solely on the authority or expertise of the person or source making the claim, rather than on supporting evidence or logical reasoning.

So, the appeal-to-authority fallacy occurs when someone argues that a statement or proposition must be true simply because an authority figure or expert supports it. This fallacy disregards the need for independent evidence, critical thinking, or evaluation of the actual merits of the argument.

Here is a quick example:
If someone claims that a certain medical treatment is effective because a celebrity endorses it, they are committing the appeal-to-authority fallacy. In this case, the endorsement of the treatment by the celebrity is seen as sufficient evidence, despite the lack of scientific research or expert consensus supporting the claim.
It is important to note that appeals to authority are not inherently fallacious. Expert opinions and the credentials of knowledgeable individuals can be valuable sources of information and guidance. However, the fallacy occurs when the authority or expertise is used as the sole basis for accepting a claim without considering other relevant evidence or counterarguments.

To avoid the appeal-to-authority fallacy, it is important to critically evaluate arguments based on the strength of evidence, logical reasoning, and the consensus among experts in the relevant field. Relying solely on the authority or status of an individual without considering the substance of their argument can lead to flawed reasoning and erroneous conclusions.
What is appeal to authority fallacy?

Easy Definition of Appeal-to-Authority Fallacy

Don't immediately adopt the same position as someone you think is an expert. Firstly, he might not be an expert in that field, and, secondly, other experts might not agree with him. If you do adopt the expert's position, you might be committing the appeal-to-authority fallacy.

Academic Definition of Appeal-to-Authority Fallacy

The appeal-to-authority fallacy is an error in reasoning that occurs when someone adopts a position because that position is affirmed by a person they believe to be an authority.

An Example of Appeal-to-Authority Fallacy

Human beings only use 10% of their brains

Learning from teachers is critical to human development, so we have a strong tendency to trust the word of perceived experts, especially if we're in unfamiliar territory. But, when someone you're arguing with cites an expert in support of their argument, you shouldn't yield straight away. The strength of his argument still depends on two things:
  • Is their expert a legitimate expert?
  • Do other legitimate experts agree with their expert?
appeal authority 10 percent of brain Remember, it doesn't have to be true just because an authority said it. It is still worth digging into why the authority believes it to be true. Simply saying "Here's a person who's better than us listen to what he thinks" is a meaningless premise on which to base an argument. Here are a couple of examples of world-class authority figures spouting nonsense:

Theoretical physicist Albert Einstein, who is regarded as one of the most brilliant minds of the 20th century, stated that human beings only use 10% of their brains. This claim is widely taken as fact, because Einstein said it. However, it's nonsense. Albert Einstein was no neurobiologist.

appeal authority geocentric model In the early 17th century, the world's leading astronomers (most famously Galileo) were refining Copernicus's theory that the Earth revolves around the Sun (the heliocentric model of the universe). The evidence was looking pretty good for Copernicus's theory being right, but the astronomers had to tread carefully when presenting this evidence because it contradicted the idea that God placed the Earth in the middle of the universe (the geocentric model). This whole debate placed Pope Urban VIII in a difficult situation, but, being open minded, he encouraged Galileo to publish the arguments for and the arguments against heliocentrism. Galileo did what the Pope asked, but his paper did not strike a good balance. It contained way too many arguments for. Galileo also couldn't resist taking a few cheap shots at the Pope and geocentrism. That was a bad judgement. Somewhat annoyed, Pope Urban put Galileo under house arrest for the last few years of Galileo's life. For a while, the Sun continued to go "dutifully" around the Earth because no one dared question the authority of the church. For that short period (before the astronomers re-mustered to champion heliocentrism again), those backing the argument that the Earth was at the centre of the universe were committing the appeal-to-authority fallacy. The Pope might have been one of the most eminent authority figures on the planet, but he was no astronomer.

So, if someone throws an "expert" into his argument, get ready with some words like this: "That is a fallacious argument. Your expert is not a legitimate expert in that field, and it is doubtful many experts would agree with him."

Another Example of Appeal-to-Authority Fallacy

Every prison has a false bar

There is an excellent example of someone naively taking an expert's statement as read in The Simpsons. The scene starts with Homer and all his mates (including Police Chief Wiggum) being locked up in a prison cell. It was one of those cells with no front wall but just long bars from the floor to the ceiling. The type you see in westerns.

After a few seconds, Chief Wiggum says: "During police training, I was told there's always a false bar to allow a quick escape in the case of a fire." Starting from the right, he proceeds to knock on each bar one at a time, saying "Not this one" each time. As he gets to the last one on the far left, he doesn't bother testing it. He just says "And, so, by a process of elimination, it has to be this one." Wiggum takes a step back and runs at the bar like a bull, head butting it has hard as he can. Clearly, the bar is not a fake, and he crumples to the floor, squealing loudly.

I'm describing this incident in The Simpsons because it stemmed from Chief Wiggum being told that every prison had a false bar by one of his seniors. Wiggum was so confident in what that expert had told him, he didn't think to question it one iota. In doing so, he committed the appeal-to-authority fallacy. It's a belting example.

A Practical Example for Appeal-to-Authority Fallacy

Who is saying that exactly?

appeal authority everybody knows Sometimes the people you're arguing with can't be bothered to research a genuine authority, so they just throw in a vague opening statement to make it look as though someone in authority supports their argument. Here are some common examples:

"It has been statistically proven..."
"Most people think..."
"The government has stated..."
"Experts believe..."
"Everybody knows..."
"It's widely believed that..."

Each of these is an example of an appeal-to-authority fallacy because a valid authority is one that can be checked and tested.

If you train yourself to spot these appeals to unnamed authorities, you can undermine a difficult interview very easily.

Interviewer: "Mr Jones, everybody knows that..."
Mr Jones: [interrupts] "Who's everybody?"
Interviewer: "I mean, most people are saying..."
Mr Jones: [interrupts] "Really? Not to me they're not. Who are most people?"
Interviewer: "Well, research shows..."
Mr Jones: [interrupts] "Whose research?"
Interviewer: "Mr Jones, can I make my point without the constant interruption?"
Mr Jones: "Please do, but start with 'I think'."
Interviewer: "Okay, I think..."
Mr Jones: [interrupts] "No one gives a monkey's what you think."

You shouldn't feel bad about smashing people who try to attack you with an appeal to unnamed authority. After all, they are looking to create an "invisible magic flaming sword" out of nothing and wield it against you. You can take it off them and hit them with it.

It's hard to avoid an appeal to an unnamed authority – it is a very natural way to start a statement. Our advice? Spot 'em and bash 'em – especially if you don't want to get tied down by what they've really got to say!

Summary of Appeal-to-Authority Fallacy

If you think someone has adopted a position to align with an authority whose facts or credentials don't withstand scrutiny, tell them they have committed the appeal-to-authority fallacy.

Critical Thinking Test

Are you good at spotting the biases, fallacies, and other cognitive effects? Can you spot when statistics have been manipulated? Can you read body language? Well, let's see!
gold cup

gold cup

gold cup

  • This test has questions.
  • A correct answer is worth 5 points.
  • You can get up to 5 bonus points for a speedy answer.
  • Some questions demand more than one answer. You must get every part right.
  • Beware! Wrong answers score 0 points.
  • 🏆 If you beat one of the top 3 scores, you will be invited to apply for the Hall of Fame.
Scoring System

Guru (+)
Hero (+)
Captain (+)
Sergeant (+)
Recruit (+)
Help Us To Improve

  • Do you disagree with something on this page?
  • Did you spot a typo?
  • Do you know a bias or fallacy that we've missed?
Please tell us using this form

See Also